1.         Foundations of Innovation Economics

a)          Technology, Innovation, and Evolutionary Theory

• Fagerberg J., “Innovation: a guide to the literature” in Fagerberg J. Mowery D. Nelson R. (ed) Handbook of innovation Oxford University Press 2004.
• Malerba F. Brusoni S. “Perspectives on innovation” Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2007.
• Hall B. Rosenberg N. “Handbook of the Economics of Innovation” Elsevier 2010.
  • Introduction to the Handbook
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. “Technological change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes” LEM Pisa 2009/April, also in Hall B. Rosenberg N. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Elsevier 2010.
• Nelson-R., Winter S., “An evolutionary theory of economic change” Harvard University Press, 1982. – ordered from Abe books
• Nelson R., “Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change” JEL, 1995.
• Nelson R., Rosenberg N., “An overview of innovation” in Landau R. and Rosenberg N., “The positive sum strategy” National Academy Press, 1986.
• Helpman, E. (2004). The mystery of economic growth. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

b)          The Nature of Ideas and Innovation

• Jones, B. F. (2009). “The Burden of Knowledge and the ‛Death of the Renaissance Man’: Is Innovation Getting Harder?” Review of Economic Studies 76(1): 283-317.
• Jones, B. F. (2010). “Age and Great Invention.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92(1): 1-14.

c)          Ideas, Innovation, and Economic Growth

• Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., and Howitt, P. (2014). “What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?” Handbook of Economic Growth 2B, 515-563.
• Solow, Robert M. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, no. 1 (1956): 65-94. – ordered from Abe books
• Arrow, Kenneth Joseph. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Readings in the Theory of Growth (1971): 131-149.
• Romer, Paul M. “Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94, no. 5 (1986): 1002-1037.
• Romer, Paul M. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5 (1990): S71-S102.
• Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth.” The Review of Economic Studies 58, no. 1 (1991): 43-61.
• Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. “Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth.” European Economic Review 35, nos. 2-3 (1991): 517-526.
• Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60, no. 2 (1992): 323-351.
• Hall, Bronwyn H. “Innovation and Productivity.” NBER Working Paper (2011).
• Braguinsky, Serguey, Atsushi Ohyama, Tetsuji Okazaki, and Chad Syverson. “Product Innovation and Industrialization.” American Economic Review 111, no. 12 (2021): 3795-3826.
• Griliches, Zvi. “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (1992): S29–S47.

d)          Knowledge, Innovation, and Productivity Growth

• Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Specifically Chapter 5: Knowledge Spillovers & Chapter 6: Knowledge as a Public Good
• Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Rosenberg, N. (1979). Technological Interdependence in the American Economy. Technology and Culture, 20(1), 25-50.
• Mokyr, J. (1990). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press. Specifically Chapter 1: Introduction
• Petroski, H. (1992). The Evolution of Useful Things. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Specifically Chapter 4: From Pins to Paper Clips
• Maddison, A. (1994). Explaining the Economic Performance of Nations, 1820-1989. In Baumol, W. J., Nelson, R. R., & Wolff, E. N. (Eds.), Convergence of Productivity: Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence (pp. 20-61).
• Baumol, W. J. (2010). The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Introduction and Chapter 1
• Hall, B. H. (2011). Innovation and Productivity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Papers, No. 17178.
• Mokyr, J. (1990). Lever of Riches.
• Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). Economics of Industrial Innovation.
• Mokyr, J. (2009). Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth. American Economic Review, 99(2), 349-355.
• Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

2.         Firm-Level Dynamics and Strategies

a)          The Schumpeterian Firm

• Dosi G. Nelson R. Winter S. “The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities” Oxford University Press 2001 Chapter 1.
• Katkalo S. Pitelis C. Teece D. “On the nature and scope of dynamic capabilities” Industrial and Corporate change August 2010.
• Winter S. “Towards a new Schumpeterian theory of the firm” Industrial and Corporate Change 2006, 1.
• Teece D. “Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action” Journal of Management Studies 49:8 December 2012.
• Winter S. “Understanding dynamic capabilities” Strategic Management Journal 24, 2003.

b)          Innovation, Market Structure, and Industry Dynamics

• Malerba F. “Innovation and the dynamics of industries: progress and challenges” International Journal of Industrial Organization 2007.
• Dahl M. Sorenson O. “The who, why and how of spin-offs” Industrial and Corporate change 2013 September.
• Jacobides M. and Winter S. “The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production” Strategic Management Journal 2005 26, 395-413.
• Klepper S. Sleeper S. “Entry by spin-off” Management Science 2005.

c)          Modelling Innovation and Industry Evolution

• Klepper S. “Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle” American Economic Review 86, 562-583, 1996.
• Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., Winter S., “A history friendly model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries” Industrial and Corporate change 2008.
• Jacobides M. “How capabilities differences, transaction costs and learning curves interact to shape vertical scope” Organization Science 2008 v. 19, n2.
• Cabral L. “Industry shake outs” Industrial and Corporate Change 2012 (3).

d)          Incentives for Innovation: Contracts and Control Rights

• Manso, G. (2011). “Motivating Innovation.” Journal of Finance 66(5): 1823-1860.
• Aghion, P., and Tirole, J. (1994). “The Management of Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(4): 1185-1209.
• Azoulay, P., Zivin, J. G., and Manso, G. (2011). “Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences.” RAND Journal of Economics 42(3): 527-554.
• Ederer, F., and Manso, G. (2013). “Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation?”, Management Science 59(7): 1479-1724.
• Lerner, J., and Malmendier, U. (2010). “Contractibility and the Design of Research Agreements.” American Economic Review 100(1): 214-246.
• Tian, X., and Wang, T. Y. (2014). “Tolerance for Failure and Corporate Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies 27(1): 211-255.
• Hellmann, T., and Thielez, V. (2011). “Incentives and Innovation: A Multi-tasking Approach.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3(1): 78-128.
• Poblete, J., and Spulber, D. F. (2012). “The Form of Incentive Contracts: Agency with Moral Hazard, Risk Neutrality, and Limited Liability,” RAND Journal of Economics 43(2), 215–234.

3.         Competitive Dynamics and Market Structures

a)          Schumpeterian Competition: Models and Evidence

• Breschi S., Malerba F., Orsenigo L., “Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovation” Economic Journal, 2000.
• Suarez F. and Lanzolla G. “The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage” Academy of management review 2007 32, 377-392.
• Bergek A. et al. “Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?” Research Policy 42 (2013) 1210-1224.
• Adner R. Snow D. “Old technology responses to new technology threats” Industrial and Corporate change 2010 n. 5.

b)          The Role of Star Scientists in Innovation

• Azoulay, Pierre, Joshua S. Graff Zivin, and Jialan Wang. “Superstar Extinction.”

c)          Inequality in Innovation

• Bell, Alex, Raj Chetty, Xavier Jaravel, Neviana Petkova, John Van Reenen. “Who Becomes an Inventor in America? The Importance of Exposure to Innovation.”
• Chetty, Raj, John Friedman, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan. “Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility.”
• Aghion, Phillipe, Ufuk Akcigit, Ari Hyytinen, and Otto Toivanen. “The Social Origins of Inventors.”
• Kaplan, Steven N., and Joshua Rauh. “It’s the Market: The Broad-Based Rise in the Return to Top Talent.”

d)          Growth theory

• Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. “Economic Growth.” McGraw-Hill (1995).
• Jones, Charles I. “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 103, no. 4 (1995): 759-784.
• Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. “The Economics of Growth.” MIT Press (2009).

4.         Innovation Diffusion and Adoption

a)          Geography and Localization of Knowledge

• Jaffe, Adam B., Manuel Trajtenberg, and Rebecca Henderson. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, no. 3 (1993): 577-598.

c)          International Technology and R&D

• Keller, Wolfgang. “International Technology Diffusion.” Journal of Economic Literature 42, no. 3 (2004): 752-782.
• Hall, Bronwyn H., Jacques Mairesse, and Pierre Mohnen. “Measuring the Returns to R&D.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2 (2010): 1033-1082.

5.         Intellectual Property Rights and Legal Frameworks

a)          Patents and IPR

• Cohen W., Goto A., Nagata A., Nelson R., Walsh J., 2002. “R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the US,” Research Policy.
• Hall B., Ziedonis R., 2001. “The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting behaviour in the US semiconductor industry: 1979-1995,” Rand Journal of Economics Spring.
• Bronwyn Hall, 2007. “Patents and Patent Policy,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23, 4.
• Rassenfosse et al., 2013. “The worldwide count of priority patents: a new indicator of inventive activity,” Research Policy (42) p. 720-737.
• Forero Pinedo, 2006. “The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries,” Research Policy, 35.
• Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., 2001. “Patents, citations and innovations,” MIT Press.
• Arora A., Ceccagnoli A, 2008. “R&D and the patent premium,” International Journal of Industrial Organization.
• Mazzoleni R., Nelson R., 1998. “The benefits and cost of strong patent protection,” Research Policy.
• Scotchmer S., 2004. “Innovation and incentives,” MIT Press Introduction.
• Gallini N., 2002. “How well is the US patent system working?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives.
• Dosi G., Marengo L., Pasquali C., 2006. “How much should society fuel the greed of innovators,” Research policy n. 35 7.

b)          Patents and Innovation

• Boldrin, Michele and David K. Levine. “The Case Against Patents.”
• Moser, Petra. “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World’s Fairs.”
• Moser, Petra. “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-century World’s Fairs.” American Economic Review 95, no. 4 (2005): 1214-1236.
• Williams, H. L. (2013). “Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome.” Journal of Political Economy 121(1): 1-27.
• Moser, P. (2013). “Patents and Innovation: Evidence from Economic History.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(1): 23-44.
• Weyl, E. G., and Tirole, J. (2013). “Market Power Screens Willingness-to-Pay.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(4): 1971-2003.
• Kremer, M. (1998). “Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4): 1137-1167.
• Kremer, M., and Snyder, C. M. (2015). “Preventives Versus Treatment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(3): 1167-1239.
• Boldrin, M., and Levine, D. (2002). “The Case Against Intellectual Property.” American Economic Association Papers & Proceedings 92(2): 209-212.
•  

c)          Patents and Technological Innovation

• Trajtenberg, Manuel, Rebecca Henderson, and Adam Jaffe. “University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5, no. 1 (1997): 19-50.
• Kogan, Leonid, et al. “Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132, no. 2 (2017): 665-712.
• Nordhaus, William D. “An Economic Theory of Technological Change.” American Economic Review 59, no. 2 (1969): 18–28.
• Moser, Petra. “Patents and Innovation: Evidence from Economic History.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 1 (2013): 23-44.
• Boldrin, Michele, and David K. Levine. “The Case Against Patents.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 1 (2013): 3-22.
• Giorcelli, Michela, and Petra Moser. “Copyrights and Creativity: Evidence from Italian Opera in the Napoleonic Age.” Journal of Political Economy 128, no. 11 (2020): 4163-4210.
• Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools.” NBER Working Paper (2001).
• Bloom, Nicholas, Mark Schankerman, and John Van Reenen. “Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry.” Econometrica 81, no. 4 (2013): 1347-1393.

d)          Copyrights, Creativity, and Open Innovation

• Giorcelli, Michela and Petra Moser. “Copyrights and Creativity. Evidence from Italian Operas.”
• Li, Xing, Megan MacGarvie and Petra Moser. “Dead Poet’s Property. Does Copyright Increase Price.”
• MacGarvie, Megan and Petra Moser. “Copyright and the Profitability of Authorship.”
• Biasi, Barbara, and Petra Moser. “Effects of Copyright on Science. Evidence from the WWII Book Replication Program.”

6.         Collaborative Innovation and Networks

a)          R&D Collaborations and the Clustering of Innovators

• Powell W., Grodal S., 2004. “Networks of innovators,” in J.Fagerberg et al., Handbook of innovation, Oxford University Press.
• Baum J., Cowan R., Jonard N., 2010. “Network independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks,” Management Science.
• Breschi S., Lissoni F., 2009. “Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks,” Journal of Economic Geography.
• Cowan R., Jonard N., 2009. “Knowledge portfolio and the organization of innovation networks,” Academy of Management Review.
• Cowan R., 2005. “Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion,” in Breschi and Malerba, Oxford University Press.
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R., 2002. “R-D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium,” American Economic Review.
• Bettencourt L. M. A., Lobo J., Strumsky D., 2007. “Invention in the City: Increasing Returns in Patenting as a Scaling Function of Metropolitan Size,” Research Policy 36, 107-120.
• Breschi S., Lissoni F., 2001. “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 10 n. 4, 975-1005.
• Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Armstrong J., 1998. “Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?,” Economic Inquiry.

b)          The Importance of Communication in Science

• Waldinger, Fabian, with Alessandro Iaria and Carlo Schwarz. “Frontier Knowledge and Scientific Production: Evidence from the Collapse of International Science.”

7.         Public Policy and Institutional Influence

a)          Innovation and Public Policy

• Bloom, Nicholas, John Van Reenen, and Heidi L. Williams. 2019. “A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (3): 163–184.
• Bloom, Nicholas, Mark Schankerman, and John Van Reenen. 2013. “Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry.” Econometrica 81 (4): 1347–1393.
• Goolsbee, A., & Jones, B. F. (Eds.). (2022). Innovation and public policy. University of Chicago Press.
  • Introduction
  • Jones, Benjamin F. and Lawrence H. Summers. 2021. “A Calculation of the Social Returns to Innovation.” In Innovation and Public Policy, University of Chicago Press.
  • Akcigit, Ufuk, Stefanie Stantcheva, Austan Goolsbee, and Benjamin Jones. 2022. “Taxation and Innovation: What Do We Know?” In: Innovation and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kerr, Sari Pekkala and William R. Kerr. 2022. “Immigration Policy Levers for US Innovation and Startups.” In: Innovation and Public Policy. Ed. by Austan Goolsbee and Benjamin Jones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hall, Bronwyn H. (ed.), ‘Tax Policy for Innovation’, Innovation and Public Policy (Chicago, IL, 2022; online edn, Chicago Scholarship Online
  • Azoulay, Pierre, and Danielle Li (eds), ‘Scientific Grant Funding’, Innovation and Public Policy (Chicago, IL, 2022; online edn, Chicago Scholarship Online
  • Reenen, John Van (ed.), ‘Innovation and Human Capital Policy’, Innovation and Public Policy (Chicago, IL, 2022; online edn, Chicago Scholarship Online
  • Lerner, Josh (ed.), ‘Government Incentives for Entrepreneurship’, Innovation and Public Policy (Chicago, IL, 2022; online edn, Chicago Scholarship Online, 22 Sept.
• Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism. Allen Lane/Penguin.
• Kattel, R., Mazzucato, M., Ryan-Collins, J. and Sharpe, S. (2018). The economics of change: Policy appraisal for missions, market shaping and public purpose. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2018-06). https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2018-06
• Landes, D. S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York: W.W. Norton. – IN PROGRESS
• Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Elias Einiö, Ralf Martin, Kieu-Trang Nguyen, and John Van Reenen. 2016. “Do Tax Incentives for Research Increase Firm Innovation? An RD Design for R&D.” NBER Working Paper 22405. National Bureau of Economic Research. University of Chicago Press

b)          Innovation and Economic Development

• Moser, Petra and Alessandra Voena. “Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act.”
• Baten, Joerg, Bianchi, Nicola and Moser, Petra. “Does Compulsory Licensing Discourage Invention? Evidence from German Patents after the US Trading-with-The-Enemy Act.”

c)          Technology Policies and National Systems of Innovation

• Ács, Zoltán J., Autio, Erkko, & Szerb, László. (2014). National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.
• Lundvall B-åke. Introduction. In: Lundvall B-Å, ed. National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press; 2010:1-20.
• Nelson, Richard R. (2008). What Enables Rapid Economic Progress: What Are the Needed Institutions? Research Policy, 37(1), 1-11.
• Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, K. “Measuring Innovation”
  • Edquist, Charles, ‘Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges’
• Mokyr, Joel. (1990). Lever of Riches.
• Mowery, David C., & Rosenberg, Nathan. (1993). The U.S. National Innovation System. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National Innovation Systems. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Liu, Feng-Chao, Simon, Denis Fred, Sun, Yu-Tao, & Cao, Cong. (2011). China’s Innovation Policies: Evolution, Institutional Structure, and Trajectory. Research Policy, 40(7), 917-931.
• Cincera, Michele, & Veugelers, Reinhilde. (2014). Differences in the Rates of Return to R&D for European and US Young Leading R&D Firms. Research Policy, 43(8), 1413-1421.
• Padilla-Pérez, Ramón, & Gaudin, Yannick. (2014). Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in Small and Developing Economies: The Case of Central America. Research Policy, 43(4), 749-759.
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
• Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London and Washington: Pinter/Cassell Academic.
• Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 3rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
• HSE e-Library: https://library.hse.ru/en/e-resources
• OECD iLibrary: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/

d)          Financial Incentives and Innovation

• Jones, Ben and Hans Hvide. “University Innovation and the Professor’s Privilege.”
• Rao, Nirupama. “Do tax credits stimulate R&D spending? The effect of the R&D tax credit in its first decade.”

e)          Australian policy-making and the economics of innovation

• Lewis, J. M., & Mikolajczak, G. (2023). Policy on innovation in Australia: Divergence in definitions, problems, and solutions. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82, 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12575
• Suseno, Y & Standing, C 2018, ‘The Systems Perspective of National Innovation Ecosystems’, Systems Research & Behavioral Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 282–307, viewed 29 January 2024, <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=130104682&authtype=shib&site=ehost-live>.
• Webster, Elizabeth. “Does Australia Have a National Innovation System.” Australian economic review 42.1 (2009): 84–87. Web.
• Wynn, K., Liu, M., & Cohen, J. (2022). Quantifying the economy‐wide returns to innovation for Australia. Australian Economic Papers, 61(3), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12262
• Bloch, Harry, and Mita Bhattacharya. “Promotion of Innovation and Job Growth in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Australia: Evidence and Policy Issues.” Australian economic review 49.2 (2016): 192–199. Web.
• Dodgson, M., Hughes, A., Foster, J., & Metcalfe, S. (2011). Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia. Research Policy, 40(9), 1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
• Davidson, S., & Potts, J. (2016). A New Institutional Approach to Innovation Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12153
• Sariego Kluge, L. S. (2019). Innovation Beyond the Market? : Public Sector Innovation and Economic Development in South Australia and Western Australia. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
• Vohra, O. (2017). Innovation as an Economic Driving Force in Australia. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(1), 13-. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v13n1p13
• Lewis, J. M., & Mikolajczak, G. (2023). Policy on innovation in Australia: Divergence in definitions, problems, and solutions. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12575
• George, AJ, and Julie‐Anne Tarr. “Addressing Australia’s Collaboration ‘Problem’: Is There a Brave New World of Innovation Policy Post COVID-19?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 80.2 (2021): 179–200. Web.
• Arup, Christopher. Innovation, Policy, and Law : Australia and the International High Technology Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Web.
• Garrett-jones, Sam. “From Citadels to Clusters: The Evolution of Regional Innovation Policies in Australia.” R & D management 34.1 (2004): 3–16. Web.

8.         Research Methods and Data Analysis

a)          Introduction to Econometrics and R Programming

• Angrist, Joshua D. and Joern-Steffen Pischke. Mastering Metrics, The Path from Cause to Effect.
• Christoph Hanck, Martin Arnold, Alexander Gerber, and Martin Schmelzer. Introduction to Econometrics with R.

b)          Measuring innovation

• OECD/Eurostat (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.; Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition | en | OECD
  • Chapter 2 – “Concepts for Measuring Innovation”

9.         Sector-Specific Innovation Studies

a)          Agricultural Innovation

• Moser, Petra and Paul Rhode. “Did Plant Patents Create the American Rose.”

c)          Issues in Technological Change

• Arthur, W. Brian. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.
• David, Paul A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
• Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, Stephen E. (1990). The Fable of the Keys. Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 1-25.
• Katz, Michael L., & Shapiro, Carl. (1994). Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93-115.
• Besen, Stanley M., & Farrell, Joseph. (1994). Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 117-131.
• Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, Stephen E. (1994). Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 133-150.
• Basker, Emek. (2012). Raising the Barcode Scanner: Technology and Productivity in the Retail Sector. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 1-27.
• Berlin, Mitchell. (1998). That Thing Venture Capitalists Do. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, January/February, 15-26.
• Gompers, Paul A., & Lerner, Josh. (2001). The Money of Invention: How Venture Capital Creates New Wealth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
• Caselli, Francesco, & Coleman, John. (2001). Cross-Country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers. American Economic Review, 91(2), 328-335.
• Comin, Diego, & Hobijn, Bart. (2004). Cross-Country Technology Adoption: Making the Theories Face the Facts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(1), 39-83.
• Castellacci, Fulvio, & Natera, Jose Miguel. (2013). The Dynamics of National Innovation Systems: A Panel Cointegration Analysis of the Coevolution Between Innovative Capability and Absorptive Capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594.
• Comin, Diego, Easterly, William, & Gong, Erick. (2010). Was the Wealth of Nations Determined in 1000 BC? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 65-97.
• The Future of Jobs: The Onrushing Wave. (2014, January 18). The Economist.
• Goldin, Claudia, & Katz, Lawrence F. (2008). The Race Between Education and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Acemoglu, Daron. (2002). Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 7-72.
• Beaudry, Paul, Doms, Mark, & Lewis, Ethan. (2010). Should the Personal Computer Be Considered a Technological Revolution? Evidence from U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Journal of Political Economy, 118(5), 988-1036.
• Frey, Carl Benedikt, & Osborne, Michael. (2013). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? University of Oxford Manuscript.